Tag Archives: legacy media

They say Covid vaccinate; I say don’t

First of three parts extracted from a full rebuttal (see here) responding to friends and family who believe everyone should get vaccinated against Covid

Why doesn’t it matter that young pregnant mothers are told it is safe and they should be vaccinated also for their unborn child? Why are children walking around with masks? Why are friends encouraging friends to sign petitions supporting vaccine mandates? Why are people being arrested because they are frightened they’ll do themselves harm if they are vaccinated? Why are we being encouraged to discriminate and to hate? Why at times do I find myself weeping uncontrollably as I experience all this unfolding in real time? Why is it that many who have been vaccinated do not want to engage on any of these issues? Why is the aforementioned now normal?

Friends’ argument

To find answers to these questions I reached out to family members and friends who believe that we must all be vaccinated, and that anyone who resists should be encouraged or forced to do so, otherwise corralled and separated for the greater good. Their argument, as I understand it has the following dimensions:

  • health: they argue that because the unvaccinated are at greater risk of contracting the virus than the vaccinated, the unvaccinated are the breeding ground for new variants. Furthermore, because it is the unvaccinated that mostly land up in hospitals, they are clogging ICU thereby depriving other patients with potentially fatal illnesses from receiving attention
  • policy: a pandemic is a public health matter not private, and so individual vaccine status is salient
  • moral: the unvaccinated display a selfish disregard for the welfare of others
  • cognitive: there is dissonance at work when those who reject science as in vaccination then seek help from science if infected
  • personal: there exists a fringe yet significant subset of society prone to conspiracy theories and libertarianism resembling MAGA-flag-waving Trumpists who see rejecting the vaccine as a mark of status
  • scientific: the anti-vaxx movement signifies a universal retreat from science into belief, religion and postulates, in which case the only way forward for any sensible human being is to follow scientific consensus

What they’re sharing seems to be underpinned by faith that government initiatives have and will prevent unnecessary deaths, gratitude to pharmaceutical companies for the vaccines, and a belief, generally, that your decision to be vaccinated and boosted was the right one, likewise for your children.

My rebuttal

Based on evidence I provided (see the full rebuttal) this is my response:

  • health: it is not the unvaccinated who were responsible for increasingly virulent or contagious variants, or are most at risk of vaccine-resistant variants that will clog ICU and morgues but mass vaccinations with leaky vaccines in the midst of a pandemic
  • policy: calls for universal mandatory vaccination has nothing to do with sound public-health policy, and everything to do with bending humankind to the will of big pharma, and captured regulatory authorities
  • morality: defending one’s health against novel, experimental, proprietary gene technology developed by an industry that has proved its malfeasance over and over, and within a context where basic human rights and alternative medical protocols have been criminalised could hardly be deemed immoral
  • cognition: those who reject vaccines do so based on thorough research, sound arguments and an unassailable logic grounded in reality as also awe and gratitude for a healthy immune system which they conscientiously nurture and train
  • personal: those whom I’ve referenced are physicians, academics and scientists of the highest order who have been systematically maligned, side-lined, disbarred, de-licensed, cancelled and/or silenced by Big pharma, regulatory authorities, government, big tech, legacy and mainstream media in cahoots with one another; hardly libertarian, flag-waving Trumpists
  • science: these past two years have demonstrated the suppression and subversion of science, consequently there is no scientific consensus, let alone science

You can find the other two parts of this selected disaggregation:

  • here (Evidence that the official Covid narrative is rigged)
  • and here (Stop believing Covid vaccines and boosters are not harming you)

These following three sections relevant to the discussion:

  • they claim sole authority over ‘the science’
  • they now assume for themselves the right to ownership of our bodies
  • their power is with our consent

can be accessed by reading the full post (I fear deeply their diktat: vaccinate; so should you) here.

References


Featured image: Pinkham Ryder. ‘Barnyard’. WikiArt. Public domain, available online here.


Hendrik Mentz lives off grid with his goats, chickens, cats, aging bullmastiff, and his thoughts. If what is presented here and elsewhere resonates please subscribe below (if viewing on your phone) or top left via your laptop.

I fear deeply their diktat: vaccinate; so should you

In which I alert to the danger that is upon us

Why doesn’t it matter that young pregnant mothers are told it is safe and they should be vaccinated also for their unborn child? Why are children walking around with masks? Why are friends encouraging friends to sign petitions supporting vaccine mandates? Why are people being arrested because they are frightened they’ll do themselves harm if they are vaccinated? Why are we being encouraged to discriminate and to hate? Why at times do I find myself weeping uncontrollably as I experience all this unfolding in real time? Why is it that many who have been vaccinated do not want to engage on any of these issues? Why is the aforementioned now normal?

My reason for this cri de cœur

To find answers to these questions I reached out to family members and friends who believe that we must all be vaccinated, and that anyone who resists should be encouraged or forced to do so, otherwise corralled and separated for the greater good. Their argument, as I understand it has the following dimensions:

  • health: they argue that because the unvaccinated are at greater risk of contracting the virus than the vaccinated, the unvaccinated are the breeding ground for new variants. Furthermore, because it is the unvaccinated that mostly land up in hospitals, they are clogging ICU thereby depriving other patients with potentially fatal illnesses from receiving attention
  • policy: a pandemic is a public health matter not private, and so individual vaccine status is salient
  • moral: the unvaccinated display a selfish disregard for the welfare of others
  • cognitive: there is dissonance at work when those who reject science as in vaccination then seek help from science if infected
  • personal: there exists a fringe yet significant subset of society prone to conspiracy theories and libertarianism resembling MAGA-flag-waving Trumpists who see rejecting the vaccine as a mark of status
  • scientific: the anti-vaxx movement signifies a universal retreat from science into belief, religion and postulates, in which case the only way forward for any sensible human being is to follow scientific consensus

What they’re sharing seems to be underpinned by faith that government initiatives have and will prevent unnecessary deaths, gratitude to pharmaceutical companies for the vaccines, and a belief, generally, that their decision to be vaccinated and boosted was the right one, likewise for their children.

If the above covers all bases, then what follows is how I see things from the point of view of someone who doesn’t want to be vaccinated and who believes no one should unless they are in the <1% at risk of death from the virus, and even then there are question marks.

To this end I’ll provide evidence that we are being lied to and manipulated. I’ll then try to explain how what ‘they’, as in the powers that be call science (big money, big pharma, medical authorities, government, big tech, legacy and main stream media (MSM), and/or the Davos World Economic Forum set), is being used to subvert science, and to separate us from nature. I’ll then try to share why this profound instance that we all experience as life here on our planet somewhere in the cosmos, and of being human, is under grave threat and therefore needs each of us to say ‘no’ to further shots and their mandates, and ‘yes’ to our own immune systems and basic human rights. Finally, throughout all that follows, I pay homage to the doctors, geneticists, statisticians, journalists and foot soldiers (whom, last mentioned, I reference at the end) whose experience, research and insight I have used as the grist for this reply. Thank you for holding the line, risking all.

Before I launch forth, I must acknowledge this post turned out longer than I would have hoped. The reasons are that the friends in question are razor sharp and schooled in discourse where opinion counts for naught and positions must be grounded and tightly argued. Length, therefore, should not be cause for discounting what I share. Instead my request is that whomever shows me if and where I’ve erred or misled. These are not ordinary times. Andy Grove, former CEO of Intel once warned: ‘only the paranoid survive’. We must know that the oligarchs are plenty paranoid. We need to be as well.

They have lied, twisted and kept us from the truth

What follows is evidence for the above statement:

They doctored the definition of vaccines: pre-2015 vaccines prevented diseases. Not anymore. Now all their experimental technology needs do to qualify as a vaccine is to offer protection from the disease. Prevent/protect; big difference.

They told you the vaccine cannot give you Covid (see here): that’s right, even if (as happened to a close family member) you contract full-blown Covid after your first shot, the vaccination didn’t do it. How come? Well you’ll need to know that the definition of ‘vaccinated’ means two shots (soon three, and counting), so the fact that the first shot suppresses your immune system up to 14 days, during which time you’re vulnerable to whatever’s in the air, including the virus, you mustn’t blame the vaccine. Also you’re classified as ‘unvaccinated’ for statistical purposes, which looks good when the graphs proving the unvaccinated are most at risk of Covid infection are paraded by the experts and MSM.

They hid clinical trial results: it took a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from a group of 30 scientists and academics (reference) to extract the first 100 or so redacted pages from the Food and Drug Administration Agency (FDA) which relayed ‘the data and information relied upon by the FDA to approve Pfizer’s experimental vaccine for Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA)’. The FDA wants the remaining pages kept under lock and key for 55 years. To discover gross malfeasance hidden from you such as claiming 95% vaccine efficiency whereas the absolute equivalent is <1% (0,84%), and serious flaws in Pfizer’s research itself, watch this 40-minute video put together by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance (CCCA): Pfizer Covid shots cause ‘More Harm Than Good’ (click here), and never again say you didn’t know.

They downplayed deaths and serious side-effects at the start of the rollout: once the rollout had begun the FDA requested a report from Pfizer on any adverse events, which came in a research paper published as Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of Pf-07302048 (Bnt162b2) received through 28-Feb-2021 (click here), which revealed 1223 deaths and thousands of serious side effects out of 42,086 cases reported in the first three months that should surely have elicited concern.

But Pfizer reassured all in the report that there was no need to panic as they would continue monitoring. That was almost a year ago. In the meantime, Sonia Elijah in Trial Site News is worried, plenty. See here (pay-walled). Elijah speaks to the aforementioned Trial Site News report in a follow-up interview conducted by Australian James Preston which at the time hit over 1.25M views in its first three days on YouTube that – surprise, surprise – YouTube then promptly took down. You can however view the interviews here (part one) and here (part two) in which Elijah reports over 150K symptoms from 40K cases in the first three months of Pfizer’s vaccination programme following emergency use authorisation. These included nine recorded deaths from anaphylaxis – four on the same day of receiving the shot, and, in the ‘pregnancy and lactation’ category of a follow up ancillary report from Pfizer to the FDA: 25 reports of ‘spontaneous abortions’ (miscarriages) among 270 ‘unusual pregnancies’ including neonatal deaths, all of which fell within the three-month time period of the report.

They are now decoupling reports of deaths from the vaccine: first Scotland and now the CDC will be withholding vaccine-related hospitalisation and death numbers for fear they’ll be ‘misrepresented’ by anti-vaxxers. That’s royal considering how data has been presented over the last two years to convince the world that you’ll never fall seriously ill or die if you’re vaccinated (see also, ‘They hid behind dodgy stats’ below). Further grist to the vaccine-industry mill is that not one of the reasons mentioned in a recent WSJ report on the unusually high number of non-Covid death pay-outs in 2021 was attributed to the vaccine, which to me illustrates the level of vested interest cover-up. The net result is that very few who suddenly fall ill or learn that a friend or family member has died considers that the vaccine might be the cause. Apropos see a personal note further down (‘they are not worthy’) in which I share four instances (three sudden illnesses and one death) that seem suspiciously like they could be vaccine-related.

They spiked research: Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) convened a meeting to decide whether also to vaccinate children aged five to 11. Days before the meeting was scheduled Elsevier withdrew a highly relevant peer reviewed paper by Drs Jessica Rose and Peter A. McCullough, which presented findings of Myocarditis adverse events in children, as reported in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (Vaers). Apropos, see here (Peter McCullough in conversation with Brett Weinstein) and here (Jessica Rose interviewed by Gal Shalev). More widely, are two first-hand accounts of doctors (Pierre Kory and Flavio Cadegiani) who report on ‘The Corruption of Medical Journals’, which can be viewed here.

They doctored research: Dr Hill of the WHO skewed results that would otherwise have proved Ivermectin was helpful in early treatment. See ‘Dr Tess Lawrie on the suppression of her work’.

They hid behind dodgy stats: by analysing the UK Office for National Statistics (Ons) data, Professors Norman Fenton and Martin Neil of Queen Mary University of London point to ‘a range of serious inconsistencies and anomalies’ that bring into question reports of vaccine effectiveness. See also this exchange between Spectator’s Fraser Nelson and Professor Graham Medley who chairs the Sage modelling committee where the latter conceded ‘we generally model what we are asked to model’.

They suppressed every alternative to the official narrative: they have made it their business to promote one narrative by targeting, censoring, censuring, de-platforming or demonetized vaccinologists, virologists, scientists, doctors and/or academics who question their one narrative. Examples I’m aware of among many more follow:

  • YouTube has taken down content or demonetised accounts: Professor John Ioannidis (scroll down) had an early post in the epidemic taken down, pointing to the psychological, sociological and economic consequences of lockdowns that were being implemented without any research having been conducted. Drs Bret and Heather Weinstein’s DarkHorse Podcast was demonetised (also here). Senator Rand Paul was suspended for ‘allegedly delivering misinformation regarding the Covid virus and masks’. Dr Aditi Bhargava’s testimony as part of U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson’s panel discussion into COVID-19 vaccine injuries, pulled. Dr Peter Doshi senior editor at BMJ (British Medical Journal) and associate professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University, of Maryland School of Pharmacy had his video removed for searching questions regarding Covid vaccines (also here). Nick Hudson of Panda’s (Pandemics Data & Analytics) had his ‘the ugly truth’ video taken down. They took down the abovementioned James Preston interview of Sonia Elijah
  • Instagram, LinkedIn and Twitter have permanently deleted accounts most often without explaining why: Robert Kennedy Jnr’s Instagram account was cancelled without notice for ‘false Covid vaccine claims’ or ‘vaccine misinformation’. Vaccinologist Dr Geert Vanden Bossche LinkedIn account was suspended for unknown reasons as was that of Prof. Marty Makary. Researcher and lecturer Dr David Thunder had his Twitter account permanently cancelled, inter alia, for warning against ‘exposing children, who are at negligible risk from Covid-19, to the risk of a vaccine whose impact on children is not yet well understood, would be irresponsible’. Abir Ballan’s Twitter account was permanently cancelled for reporting on the aforementioned conversation between Drs Laurie and Hill in which the latter admitted to doctoring the results of their study to downplay the effectiveness of Ivermectin (later rescinded). Dr Robert Malone’s Twitter account was permanently suspended he suspects for sharing the abovementioned CCCA report: ‘Pfizer Covid shots cause ‘More Harm Than Good’’. Malone’s Facebook and Instagram accounts were also cancelled for unspecified crimes.
  • medical authorities have vilified, hunted and/or taken out key academics and practitioners who question, stray from or disagree with the official narrative: Professors Martin Kulldorff (Harvard), Sunetra Gupta (Oxford) and Jay Bhattacharya (Stanford) were conspired against by Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and Francis Collins, former director of the NIH, for arguing, in their Great Barrington Declaration, targeted vaccines for the vulnerable and the lifting of lockdowns. The Australian medical authority hit Dr Mark Hobart so hard for ‘falsifying vaccine records’ that Melbourne doctors were subsequently terrified to issue exemptions from vaccines even for individuals, like Betty Pezzimenti, who are at mortal risk of anaphylaxis (see this Bret Weinstein interview). US Medical Authorities are not far behind with the following prominent doctors that advocate early treatment for Covid being targeted one after the other: Dr Peter McCullough, one of the most published medical practitioners in the world sued for a third-party error for which he’s being held responsible (Joe Rogan Interview | transcription, page 37). Dr Paul Merrick ‘an exceptional physician by any standards – run out of his hospital and demeaned’ (ibid., page 37. See also here & here). Paediatric cardiologist Dr Kirk Milhoan ‘among the most qualified individuals in the world for managing Covid and commenting on cardio myocarditis in children … a pastor at a local country congregation, has run a food bank his whole life (and) travelled to emerging economies to provide free treatment’ kicked out of his hospital because he was providing early treatment’ (Joe Rogan Interview | transcription, pages 40-41). Dr Robert Malone inventor of the messenger RNA (mRNA) technology underpinning the vaccine, Chief Medical & Regulatory Officer for the Unity Project of more than 17000 physicians and scientists worldwide and outspoken critic of mass vaccination particularly for children received a long list of complaints filed with the Medical Licensing Board for Maryland three days before Christmas to which he had to answer under threat of having his licence revoked (Joe Rogan Interview | transcription, page 19). But wait for it; that’s not all: the US Federation of State Medical Boards has just warned they will soon be identifying, investigating and potentially punishing physicians or pharmacies involved in marketing claims associated with Ivermectin with respect to Covid-19 (see here) leading to more doctors being fired, such as, inter alia, more recently, Dr Edith Behr in Pennsylvania.

They fund the narrative: MSM and non-government organisations (NGOs) are richly rewarded for promoting the narrative. Here’s a list of Bill and Melinda Gates beneficiaries, which includes >R12M USD to the Guardian and >6M to the Conversation. South Africa’s very own Bhekisisa scoring just shy of R4M USD (that’s a lot of money converted to ZAR). Other generous donors are George Soros’s Freedom Foundation, which, inter alia, funds the Daily Maverick, which churns out pro-vaxx content, and with their comment section battened down since the start of the pandemic. What price freedom of the press? Meanwhile, Meet the 40 New Billionaires Who Got Rich Fighting Covid-19.

They now deploy a phalanx of fact checkers: a new front in their battle to undermine truth in the name of truth is the fact-checkers. I say this because I’ve recently noticed that certain of my primary sources for this post are now being ‘fact checked’ and labelled ‘false’. I point for instance to this Agence France-Presse (AFP) dismissal of the 40-minute video I referenced above by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance, which identifies four elements in the video they claim to be false so as to disqualify the whole (see image below). For instance a ‘non-fact’ they identify is that one of the long list of young sportsmen reported in the video dropping dead hadn’t been vaccinated. I could argue the other three ‘errors’ as well, but you can reach your own conclusions after watching the video. This then apparently serves as evidence to slap a ‘cancelled-nothing-to-see-here’ label over the video that Google – who owns search – ensures is the first item anyone gets directed to when searching for the video.

Search ‘Canadian Covid Care Alliance: more harm than good’ and guess what Google presents? Nothing to see; move on, now

Update: just in, the CCCA has fact-checked the AFP fact checkers, see here.

They are now ‘the science’

Whether Anthony ‘I represent science’ Fauci personifies science, or the medical-industrial complex is perhaps moot; what is harder to dispute is that he and those he represents have glossed over what would normally be understood as science set out below and in its place constructed ‘the science’, an edifice that rules supreme, as we are now experiencing to our alarm:

  • not all viruses are the same: generally speaking, viruses seek out specific hosts in which to propagate. For instance measles seeks out children whereas Covid goes for the elderly and sickly. Measles is highly infectious but doesn’t change much over time unlike flu and Corona viruses which are highly mutable and so keep coming at us with ever-new variants (reference: Vanden Bossche, G: here (interview) or here (transcription), particularly >32:17)
  • not all vaccines are the same: some traditional vaccines provide lifelong immunity, current gene-based vaccines used to combat Covid don’t, and cannot. For instance traditional, live, attenuated (as in a weakened form of the disease) vaccines provide sterilizing lifelong immunity against measles, mumps and rubella (MMR), whereas the new gene-based mRNA technologies produced by Pfizer and Moderna turn out to be leaky as their efficacy wanes rapidly, and are therefore non-sterilizing. Another drawback is their laser-specificity which means they’re already largely out of date as soon as a new variant takes over
  • not all vaccination programmes are the same: the current vaccination programme is aimed en masse, i.e. everybody, as legislated in the country in question. Past vaccination campaigns have been targeted, for instance, at the very young for measles, and have provided immunity. The current drive to vaccinate every single human being on the planet has never ever in the history of humankind been attempted, and is believed to be driving new variants, as will be discussed below
  • each of us has an immune system: we were all born with an intact (innate) immune system which is our first line of defence to ward off pathogenic danger (i.e. bacteria and viruses). We strengthen our immune system through diet (for instance breast milk at birth | see here, here and here followed by balanced whole foods growing up and into old age), exercise, and immune training through exposure to the world of pathogens, and not locked down living in a bubble. Under attack the epithelial cell receptors on the surface of our bodies (skin) and throughout our body (cell lining of our nose, mouth, intestine, blood vessels, etc.) send out signals for B-cells to attach themselves to the attacker and to manufacture antibodies, and for killer T-cells to destroy infected cells. B & T-cells are under the management of helper T-cells that call in macrophages to sterilize, as in completely kill off the virus, thereby helping humankind achieve herd immunity. Some B and T-cells turn into memory cells which stay behind as early warning and defence systems in case the virus or a cousin ever returns. With constant exposure to and mounted protection from the outside world our innate immune system learns and develops as our adaptive immune system. We can further strengthen our immune system by priming it in advance against highly contagious pathogens such as measles and polio through exposure. This is where vaccines have a role to play, also in building herd immunity. Apropos, to note that because mRNA vaccines do not completely kill, as in sterilise, the virus they can never offer humankind herd immunity against a virus that mutates rapidly, so mandating vaccines in order to achieve herd immunity is wishful thinking
  • how our innate immune system goes about protecting us from the SARS-CoV-2 virus: a relatively small number of Covid viruses enter our body by latching onto the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) protein receptors on the surface of the mucosal cells in the nasal cavity, unlock and then release their RNA programme into the cell with instructions to make new virus particles according to its genetic blueprint (references: here, here & here). Immediately the body’s innate immune system springs into action where, armed with the memory of prior infections that enable it to target 54 related pathogenic proteins there’s, what Robert Malone describes ‘a dance between your escalating immune system and the spreading virus’ (reference here >34:01). If the body’s natural immune defence is unable to stem the invasion because of a generally rundown physical constitution or saddled with comorbidities, the pathogen gradually spreads down the respiratory tract to infect first the upper and then lower lungs and could spread to other organs. If our natural immune’s defence proves successful (which, incidentally, was the case with potentially >99% of the human population before the first vaccines were rolled out) then our body’s immune system is strengthened with an expanded arsenal against upcoming variants

With the above science back into the picture, I shall try to convey to you, dear reader, why I believe that blind trust in the Covid vaccinal narrative is misguided.

They now assume for themselves the right to ownership of our bodies

In a previous post (A grin without a cat: Covid-19) I argued that if humankind wants a glimpse of its future, to look no further than any modern factory farm where animals are quarantined, vaccinated, pumped full of antibiotics and on a conveyor belt to their inevitable end. No escape.

To understand how close we are to this dystopian outcome let us explore the consequences of part one of this essay:

They rule against nature: for me the most damning proof that the powers that be have little interest in health or saving lives beyond mandating vaccines, is that our immune system has not once in the past two years, ever been acknowledged let alone celebrated for what it is: our primary and most effective defence against SARS-CoV-2. Nor has there been any purposeful discussion around ensuring our immune system is and remains robust. Consequently we’re now confronted with the bizarre scenario where the only deemed front against Covid is vaccinal antibodies. The fact that my natural immune system has been and continues working equally hard and, it turns out, far more reliably than vaccinal antibodies at keeping me alive simply isn’t credited. In summary: how come >99% of us didn’t die before the vaccines arrived? How come, a year later, vaccines get all the credit?

Update: the CDC has now added a ‘healthy living’ component to their website. Covering their arse, maybe?

They hunt and take out those among us whom they’ve labelled the enemy: it confounds me that most people who have chosen to be vaccinated are insistent that others do so as well, instead of experiencing relief that they are at last safe. For how else must one interpret the cruelty now unfolding against the unvaccinated who must be unpeopled, segregated, brutalised, removed from the voters’ role, fined, dismissed, children sacrificed, robbed of their childhood and bullied at school?

Yet blaming and targeting the unvaccinated is as logical as the farmer spraying Roundup blaming his neighbouring organic farmer for his own super weeds.

Biology 101: a virus, cell, species evolves or mutates in order to overcome an obstacle, like what happens when you spray Doom or lay Rattex only to be faced later on with Doom-resistant flies and Rattex-resistant rodents. Further: whereas there is ongoing dispute around whether asymptomatic people (vaccinated or unvaccinated) can spread the virus (references: here, here, here & here) vaccinated people infected by the virus, currently in the majority (source), are as contagious as the unvaccinated (source).

Instead, blame lies squarely in their court, as in a hubristic, universal public health policy against which Geert Vanden Bossche warned right from the very beginning, namely, that conducting mass vaccination programmes with leaky non-sterilizing vaccines in the midst of a pandemic would breed ever more virulent and/or infectious viral strains. Clearly Vanden Bossche’s warning has come to pass.

Their fall-back claim that vaccines ensure you don’t fall seriously ill or die is second-hand-car-dealership talk because, as Dr Aditi Bhargava pointed out, then they should acknowledge, instead of outlaw, early treatment which yet again proves this is about exclusive rights to your and my immune systems. It’s not about health, at all.

And you think it’s going to end? Fat chance as Pfizer prepares to roll out a three-shot vaccine for Omicron alongside pending FDA approval to vaccinate infants, and in case that doesn’t whip humanity into line waiting in the wings is an HIV scare.

They seem dissociated: I often wonder who are these space-suited scientists genetically modifying mice, reprogramming mosquitoes and preparing the next shipment of technology to be injected into the arms of humanity?

Do they connect with or feel in any way responsible for possible or even probable side-effects from the vaccines? Does the anxiety of someone who took the jab and is now in some doctor’s waiting room touch them in any way? And I would direct the same question to the laptop executives in boardrooms, scenario planners and politicians playing wargames that have turned our planet into one giant hospital where we’re all mandated to be injected with vaccinal components and sequences none of us is able to monitor, modify or switch off.

I would like to ask whether they themselves have the faintest understanding of the technology they’re injecting into us? Yet most none calls a halt. Few admit they’re stumped, and that things are not working as hoped. Instead all we hear day after day is that the vaccines are safe. For me their hubris is terrifying. This cannot end well.

Not only are their vaccines not working, they are doing us harm: what follows is a list of possible consequences of the vaccine within a context where, as we have seen, regulatory authorities refuse to release data:

  • our immune systems are under siege: wave after wave of vaccination and booster-generated spike being manufactured beyond the mucosal barrier, far in excess of severely ill Covid patients, is harming healthy immune systems throughout the planet that would otherwise have combatted the virus naturally and by now have built herd immunity
  • key vaccinal adjuvants are allergenic for certain people: polyethylene glycol, (PEG) is an adjuvant (i.e. an additive intended to ‘enhances the body’s immune response’ OED) introduced to stabilise and facilitate the cellular uptake of mRNA but which is at the same time potentially highly inflammatory (Malone, 00:20:37 here), having caused anaphylaxis and cardiac collapse in animal experiments. PEG poses a hidden but high risk for approximately 2% of the population that might not know they’re allergenic, resulting in acute anaphylaxis (Stephanie Seneff and Greg Nigh, page 11) which, if we recall, had already become apparent during dodgy Pfizer trials that the CDC tried to suppress (see: ‘They downplayed deaths and serious side-effects at the start of the rollout’ above)
  • lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) containers could trigger breast cancer: the synthetic fatty containers for the mRNA have been shown to cause inflammation and swelling of the lymph gland in the armpit of some vaccinees thus posing a danger of axillary lymphadenopathy that, particularly for women, could develop into breast cancer (Seneff & Nigh, pages 8&9)
  • injected mRNA is still circulating months later: Robert Malone hypothesis that the pseudouridine they used to replace the uridines in the mRNA he invented might have been so successful in keeping the mRNA intact long enough to reach the spleen that mRNA breached the immune system’s early defences completely and instead of it breaking up after a few days as promised on the CDC website (refer the image below) mRNA and the lab-spike it’s generating the meanwhile, is still travelling the lymphatic system and beyond months later. (Röltgen et al via Malone here). Not a happy outcome.
The CDC assures humankind that vaccinal spike is harmless (note the bold)

  • lab-engineered spike is far more toxic that the real thing: the spike protein that injected mRNA instructs cells to manufacture in our bodies has been genetically engineered to stay open, and anchored to the surface of cells. This was achieved by replacing two adjacent amino acids with prolines, a highly inflexible amino acid. Pfizer and Thomson-Reuters fact-checkers claim the modification makes the spike safer. Not so, Robert Malone corrected, by underlining that ‘science is science’, and that their modification has in fact enhanced spike’s immunogenicity (Malone >32:08). Consequently instead of fusing, lab spike now attaches itself to ACE2 receptors wherever it can find them and remain docked weeks on end potentially causing harm (see also the next point)
  • instead of Covid being combatted at the periphery, lab spike is being mass-produced throughout our body: mRNA spreads throughout the body instructing cells it encounters to produce lab spike. Now consider this isn’t happening in the mucosal lining of our nose and throat where wild infection would strike and be combatted as part of natural infection (see ‘how our innate immune system goes about protecting us from the SARS-CoV-2 virus’, above). Instead this is happening in the ovaries (in fifth-place after injection site, liver, spleen and adrenal glands), testes (with reproductive implications), our brains (with neurological implications), and all over where cells are being instructed to create a toxin that will in itself likely cause endothelial damage (Mikolaj Raszek, here)
  • lab-spike tampers with blood pressure, and more: ACE2 play a critical role in regulating angiotensin II (ANGII), which is responsible for blood pressure and cellular water levels, inter alia, by restricting or dilating blood vessels. If ACE2 regulates well, then expect optimum blood pressure, and wound healing. But if ACE2 is prevented from doing its job because lab-spike has attached itself to ACE2 receptors then things go horribly wrong through overproduction of ANGII leading to restricted blood vessels, soaring blood pressure, systemic hypertension, myocarditis, strokes and heart failure (Krishna Sriram, Paul Insel and Rohit Loomba). Clearly Novak Djokovic did his homework
  • wave on wave of spike is confusing the immune system and runs the risk of priming self-reactive antibodies to attack host proteins: SARS-CoV-2 virus includes a number of sequences homologous with human protein, which explains why Covid 19 infections can trigger a range of cascading conditions including coronary arterial disease, strokes, and systemic hypertension (Seneff & Nigh, page 21). Wild spike contains almost all the aforementioned sequences as does lab-spike which the circulating mRNA instructs cells throughout the body to generate. First jab and our immune systems generate vaccinal antibodies to combat spike docked on the surface of the cell membrane. Second jab three weeks later, ditto. Three, four months pass and there’s a third wave of spike-generated antibodies being generated causing confusion as to their relationship to booster-spike, existing antibodies from the first and second jabs and/or human protein homologous with spike, thus potentially triggering cross-reactive antibodies pathologically primed to attack the liver, mitochondria, nervous and digestive systems, pancreas and blood platelets (Seneff & Nigh, page 15), and the consequential danger of hatching a range of autoimmune diseases that lead to low platelet counts, peripheral nerve damage, pernicious anaemia and lupus (ibid. pp 16-17)
  • the last two years have set the stage for antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) whereby the immune system assists rather than repels the virus: there is an increasing and real fear of a perfect storm: mass vaccination programmes driving newer more infectious or lethal variants, vaccinal antibodies not only unable to sterilise the virus but also rapidly waning in efficacy therefore requiring continual boosting resulting in a situation that invading viruses are able to exploit either directly through gaining cellular entry by exploiting gaps in the defence (Jesse Santiano & Seneff and Nigh, page 12)) or indirectly by exploiting cytotoxic inflammatory conditions in the wake of early infections leading to tissue damage and heightened infection, and unable to be cleared by a depleted immune system (Seneff and Nigh, page 13). How to understand ADE? Perhaps a useful metaphor is seeing the SARS-CoV-2 virus as a guerilla detachment that can exploit a vaccine-battered and therefore weakened immune system which finds exhausted sentries asleep at their posts with the gates wide open or vaccine-induced inflammation and tissue damage leading to heavily compromised diseased soldiers who become the entry point. What is the likelihood of ADE? Paul Offit says it can’t happen, Geert Vanden Bossche says it will happen if there’s mass vaccination against Omicron, and Paul Alexander believes that soaring infection rates and deaths among the vaccinated tell us it is already happening. In the end: man proposes, God disposes. See also: Derek Lowe & Edward Nirenberg
  • lab spike could be causing long-term prion-like diseases: research flowing from papers by Weickenmeier et al., Mueller et al., & J. Bart Classen suggest that vaccinal spike might be causing prion-like diseases (Seneff & Nigh, pages 22-5), in that lab-spike contains five prion-like motifs one of which is located in the proline region mentioned above (see: ‘lab-engineered spike is far more toxic that the real thing’ above) and is able to bind to host proteins inducing misfolding into prions. They argues that the pH balance in the spleen, accumulating spike and resultant inflammation create the perfect condition for hatching toxic prion oligomers which are then transported as exosomes up the vagus nerve to pathways in the brain causing widespread neurodegenerative disease manifesting over time as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (progressive weakness and muscle atrophy)
  • lab spike side-effects might be early signals of serious disease developing in the background: Seneff and Nigh contend that early Vaers reports of headaches, nausea, dizziness, encephalitis, blood clots, Bell’s palsy, anaphylaxis might be important cardio vascular and neurological signals that we downplay or ignore at our peril (Seneff & Nigh, page 22)
  • our innate immune system is being phased out: reports of the activation of latent herpes Zoster (shingles) on Vaers suggest that vaccinal antibodies are suppressing the innate immune system (Seneff & Nigh, page 21). Additionally bear in mind that ongoing lab-induced stimulation biases vaccinal antibodies over the innate immune system therefore perpetrating what is known as original antigenic sin thus putting humankind in grave danger if ever confronted by a vaccine-resistant variant with no plan B because our innate immune systems have been phased out. Apropos see this report: ‘Israeli SARS-CoV-2 Omicron cases surge, as do deaths while study reveals a fourth booster raises antibodies yet doesn’t appear to stop Omicron’
  • geneticists are playing God: given that the very virus with which we are now grappling is almost certainly lab-made – the smoking gun being research suggesting that the SARS-CoV-2 virus contains ‘proprietary (i.e. patented) sequences’ (K. Balamurali et al here) allegedly held by Moderna Therapeutics, Moderna TX, Cambia, CureVac AG and even Monsanto (references: Rose here and an interview with the CEO of Moderna here) – the spectre of reverse engineering causing chromosomal damage cascading downwards trans-generationally or any other genetically-engineered nightmare is a distinct possibility (Seneff & Nigh, pages 26-30). At issue is a paper that has just come out (Aldén et al, here) reporting that mRNA ‘reverse transcribes’ into DNA in the nucleus of liver cells (and, therefore, potentially, testes and ovaries with transgenerational implications), something the CDC assured vaccinees would never happen (see image below). See also: Peter McCullough’s alert here, a Trial Site News report here, Reddit discussion here and a broader sweep here
CDC assures vaccinees that mRNA won’t reverse-transcribe into DNA
  • vaccines are falling seriously short in a number of other ways: whereas the body’s natural immune response is immediate, vaccinal antibodies need two injections spread over weeks to come into their own leaving the vaccinee vulnerable to Covid, during the interim. Whereas the innate response is broader, longer lasting and against many different antigens present in the virus, vaccinal antibodies are not mucosal and only pinpoint the Covid virus’s spike protein but of an earlier variant, no longer circulating.

To illustrate some of the above:

  • consult this list of 1000 peer-reviewed studies questioning Covid-19 vaccine safety, published by Informed Choice Australia
  • visit Robert Malone’s website where he reports on, and references vaccine-associated deaths and disability in children and young adults
  • do the same with respect to Jessica Rose, who provides numbers (scroll down) with analysis of Vaers stats
  • read Rose’s consolidated finding of mortality among the very young based on coroners’ reports here
  • read these two most recent reports of three young children who died days after being vaccinated here and here
  • list on Twitter of people who died in their sleep here

Finally, I share four personal illustrations of possible vaccine-induced injuries. A family member suffered full-blown Covid after her first Pfizer shot. After her second she developed what she described as a bumpy heart diagnosed as arrhythmia and ascribed to ‘post-Covid’ (not ‘post-vaccine’!?). Months later her condition hasn’t changed and after yet another thorough medical assessment her diagnosis is now depression. Hers, I believe, is a template: dull humankind’s grief through mass medication (antidepressants and sleeping tablets). I received news of a second fully vaccinated family member being admitted to George hospital and diagnosed having suffered a series of mini-strokes. A few weeks previously a fully vaccinated friend died or a heart attack. The fourth instance was a distraught neighbour sharing that her perfectly fit father has recently been in and out of hospital but doesn’t want to consider vaccines might be the cause, although (his daughter reports), “I think he knows, because he’s heartbroken.”

They are not worthy

I’m hopeful that I was able to get across that, with respect to:

  • health: it is not the unvaccinated who were responsible for increasingly virulent or contagious variants, or are most at risk of vaccine-resistant variants that will clog ICU and morgues
  • policy: calls for universal mandatory vaccination has nothing to do with sound public-health policy, and everything to do with bending humankind to the will of the few
  • morality: defending one’s health against novel, experimental, proprietary gene technology developed by an industry that has proved its malfeasance over and over, and within a context where basic human rights and alternative medical protocols have been criminalised could hardly be deemed immoral
  • personal: those whom I’ve referenced are physicians, academics, scientists of the highest order who have been systematically maligned, side-lined, disbarred, de-licenced, cancelled and/or silenced by Big pharma, regulatory authorities, government, big tech, legacy and mainstream media in cahoots; hardly libertarianism, flag-waving Trumpists
  • cognition: those who reject vaccines do so based on thorough research, sound arguments and an unassailable logic grounded in reality as also awe and gratitude for a healthy immune system which they conscientiously nurture and train
  • science: these past two years have demonstrated the suppression and subversion of science, consequently there is no scientific consensus, let alone science

That said, the contents of this post stands for naught if no one bothers to read or even skim any of it. Everything above stands for naught if the powers that be manage to block the sharing thereof via social media and/or convince readers that facts and conclusions reached are faulty or the mad ravings of some misguided, alt-right conspiracy theorist from deep inside his rabbit hole.

For example it comes as no surprise that Drs Vanden Bossche, Malone, Rose have been discredited, as have most of the other sources I have referenced. One such critic is Orak (aka Dr David H. Gorski) whom you can access here. Gorski, like his fellow operators, spends a good deal of his time, in his words: ‘refuting pseudoscientific claims made by quacks, cranks, and antivaxers’, which no doubt refers equally to this post of mine.

Read Orak and all the fact-checkers with which Google presents you, but while doing so please note who are being fact-checked (Gates? Fauci? Pfizer? WEF? WHO? FDA? CDC? Guardian? Daily Maverick? Bhekisisa?), and the pattern: an authorial ad hominem denigrating superiority. A focus on one or two mostly minor or extraneous points in order to distract and assure readers nothing to see; move along now; alternatively to discourage, frighten, beat into submission anyone, like I, who experiences disquiet, a sense of foreboding and grief witnessing those whom he loves willingly trusting what he believes is an all-enveloping evil that has no conscience, tells lies, deceives and coerces us into accepting a world where we will be tagged and told what is good for us, like: the next jab, owning nothing and cold showers. Worse is the deep sense that our capitulation will pave the way for a transhuman future determined by those who control the algorithm, leaving each of us diminished, obedient and fearful of offending the machine and, on the etheric plane, an end to the flowering of consciousness on our planet, over which we hold custodianship thereby plunging the universe into utter darkness for aeons to come.

I have reached the above conclusion because it’s clear to me that they now know there is no bottom line so they can clamp down any time they decide. It’s also clear to me that we are not dealing with flesh and blood but with a mind or a presence against which Rudolph Steiner warned us when he appealed to parents and teachers not to encourage intellectualising before children have incarnated into their bodies. The result are the Justin Trudeaus of our world: poster boys and girls of the New Order, who practise in front of a mirror, and disapproving of lowly truckers who must be crushed one at a time for daring to protest by cutting off funding, freezing bank accounts, impounding and auctioning their means of keeping body and soul together. Finally it’s clear to me that if they succeed nothing will stand between each one of us and their power.

It is we who are doing this to ourselves, and our children.

Acknowledgments:

In addition to all mentioned above I pay tribute to Sonia (Twitter) and Mark September (Facebook) who almost daily hold journalists et al accountable for spreading, instead of interrogating the Covid vaccine narrative, and Matthew Mentz (Niche Unity) whose ear is to the ground on these matters.

References:

Featured image: Albert Pinkham Ryder. ‘Jonah’. WikiArt. Public domain, available online here.

Further resources:

Early treatment of Covid:

Feeds of some of those mentioned in the text:


Hendrik Mentz lives off grid with his goats, chickens, cats, aging bullmastiff, and his thoughts. If what is presented here and elsewhere resonates please subscribe below (if viewing on your phone) or top left via your laptop.